Olympic Threat to Wanstead Flats?

The Metropolitan Police are intending to use part of Wanstead Flats as a temporary briefing centre for officers working on the Olympics policing operations. This is intended to be for a period of 90 days, which includes construction of the site, use of the site during the Olympic and Paralympic games, and the time taken to dismantle the site.

Later this summer the police are planning to start a period of public and planning consultation about the proposal, and we are told that "Any move would first be subject to a public consultation to gather feedback from people living in the area, and address any concerns about the restrictions it would put on public use of the area during the games."

In an article in the Wanstead & Woodford Guardian, Peggy Bitten of the Friends of Epping Forest said: "We're not going to object but we do hope there will be a full consultation, and that there will be total restitution afterwards."

A spokeswoman from the City of London said: "We think there is a way forward that will allow the police to be based at Wanstead Flats, while retaining the Forest's legal guarantees, and at the same time securing benefits for the long term interest of the area. A proposal to use the fairground site for a limited period in return for an investment which can be used in the local area, seems worthy of full consultation with the community." She also added that: "This is a difficult position for us in our role of protecting the Forest. We are confident that we are seeking a solution that would be in the best interests of most people."

I note that in all three comments - by the Metropolitan Police, by the Friends of Epping Forest and by the City of London, no mention is made about the damage that may be done to the wildlife and ecology of the area.

The Police, of course would have relatively little interest in or even knowledge of the potential threat to the environment. The Friends of Epping Forest do, but only mention the restoration of the grassland. And of course, there is a tendency for things that happen in the southern reaches of the Forest to have less importance to those that live further north - and who generally will have less knowledge of how much disturbance there already is in this area and how delicately balanced the survival of some of our local wildlife is. In a subsequent discussion about the proposal at a Wanstead Park Community Project meeting - and the fact that the probable site would be on the that rather poor-but-firm area that is used by the fair - a vociferous argument was put forward that, because the area was such as it is, it couldn't do any harm. This is fairly typical of the unappreciative view that because an area isn't - for example - covered in wild flowers or trees, it has no value. Diversity is often overlooked, and the area supports a ground-flora that doesn't exist in quantity elsewhere on the Flats. We probably don't know just how much it does support!

The City of London - the Conservators of Epping Forest - should have a good knowledge of the effect that possible events or temporary structures and usage could have, but from previous experience this has proved not always to be the case. As far as restoration afterwards is concerned, I have seen various instances where restoration work has been poorly carried out after works have taken place. (see here, for example, in relation to the Reservoir Stream recently) In my perception it has not been a good record. Their comment that the solution "that would be in the best interests of most people" is not encouraging for local residents or wildlife. "Most people", of course, will be the millions that will attend the Games, and security will be of utmost importance.

We don't know yet what the Metropolitan Police will require on Wanstead Flats. The suggested area is the Fairground site - and this may well lead at least to the possibility of the fairs and circuses not being able to take place, as the time limit that has been suggested by the City of London if this was allowed, would be around 120 days. Whatever your views on these activities, they are historic ones and should be able to continue and not lost due to the Olympics, even temporarily.

The Metropolitan Police have also said that there is no existing Met. building in the right place and of the right size for their purpose and a search for other alternatives has shown the Flats as the only practicable site. Was this requirement not taken into account in the planning stages for the Olympics? Already Hackney Marshes has lost much of its football pitches, and we are getting the outcasts here - and although it is difficult to judge, probably a lot more cars (and people!) polluting the area as a by-product.

My gut reaction is that I don't like the sound of this. We have two group's of people already that aren't really knowledgeable and/or interested in the south of the Forest and the damage that could be done - let alone the inconveniences to local people, and a third which from the comment might be perceived as looking towards a financial gain "which could be used in the local area."  The Metropolitan Police have already in the past used land adjacent to the Forest for their own purposes - in the form of a tower block by Bush Wood - and this on the site of a picturesque Swiss-style cottage (see picture here). The cottage was demolished in 1962 in spite of local protests when the Metropolitan Police erected the multi-story accommodation block for police cadets on the site. Now that same building has been sold off by the police and is classy residential housing. That shouldn't have been allowed to happen and I think that perhaps this shouldn't, either.

Paul Ferris, 8 June 2010

A public meeting was held at Durning Hall Community Centre, Forest Gate on Wednesday 14th July, and was attended by - I estimate - over 200 people. For the flyer, CLICK HERE

For the City of London's view, CLICK HERE

For the local Guardian's report, CLICK HERE

For the Evening Standard's report, CLICK HERE

For the Random Blowe view, CLICK HERE